In Gwangju, a controversy has arisen over whether the shooting death of a man wielding a weapon by a police officer constitutes “self-defense.” The incident occurred in the early morning of the 26th on Geumnam-ro, where Police Inspector A used a firearm while subduing 51-year-old B, resulting in B’s death.
Lawyers argue that this could be considered justifiable self-defense. Although the event involved the controversial use of force, it followed established procedures where the officer attempted to de-escalate the situation using a Taser, then warning shots before resorting to live ammunition.
The situation brought attention to the question of proportionality—whether the use of live ammunition against a knife was justified. Lawyers like Shin Min-young noted that, although subject to debate, using a firearm against a knife attack could still adhere to the principle of proportionality. Others, like Ha Hee-bong, pointed out that given the life-threatening situation the officer faced, the response might indeed be seen as necessary.
If self-defense is not recognized, the incident may also be evaluated under the concept of “justifiable act” as per Article 20 of the Criminal Code, which allows for acts performed in the line of duty or not breaching societal norms.
The Gwangju Police Department is currently investigating the appropriateness of firearm use and the exact circumstances of the event.