Jang Dong-hyuk: “Together Criticize the Mistakes of the Lee Jae-myung Government” vs. Cho Kuk: “Definitely Sever Ties with Yoon’s Faction”

[the300],

[Seoul=Newsis] Reporter Kim Myung-nyeon = Jang Dong-hyuk, leader of the People’s Power, and Cho Kook, leader of the Cho Kook Innovation Party, are heading to their seats after a commemorative photo at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the morning of the 1st. 2025.12.01. [email protected] /Photo=Kim Myung-nyeon,
, ‘Jang Dong-hyuk, leader of the People’s Power, met Cho Kook, leader of the Cho Kook Innovation Party, on the 1st and asked for the cooperation in pointing out the wrongdoings of the Lee Jae-myung administration as a part of the opposition parties. In response, Cho asked Jang to declare a complete break with Yoon Seok-yeol and his faction on the occasion of the first anniversary of the emergency martial law on December 3.’,
,
, ‘Jang and Cho had a meeting in the morning at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul. The meeting was arranged as Cho paid a courtesy visit to the People’s Power leader. It was the first time Cho visited the leader of the People’s Power since he entered the political scene during the 2024 general elections.’,
,
, ‘During the meeting, Jang emphasized the importance of public welfare to Cho. Jang stated, “Taking care of the public welfare is the essence of politics and the reason for a party’s existence,” adding that “while political stances may differ at times, efforts should be combined to prioritize public welfare and look after the people.”‘,
,
, ‘Cho directed strong criticism towards Jang regarding the December 3 martial law. Cho said directly to Jang, “Unfortunately, the People’s Power currently seems to have distanced itself significantly from traditional conservative values,” adding that, “The senior members and leadership of the party appear to be protectors of the rebellion leader Yoon Seok-yeol and the voice of the extreme-right Taegeukgi forces represented by Hwang Kyo-ahn and Jeon Kwang-hoon.” He further questioned, “You supported the resolution to lift martial law early in the morning on December 4 last year. I wonder about your current stance. You seem to regret that decision.”‘,
,
, ‘Cho urged, “On the first anniversary of martial law, please declare a clear break with the Yoon Seok-yeol faction. Sever ties with election fraud advocates, pseudoreligious groups, and extreme right-wing fascists,” adding, “While the Democratic Party fulfills its role as moderates and the Cho Kook Innovation Party takes on a progressive stance, we hope the People’s Power would revive as a true conservative party and conduct politics accordingly.”‘,
,
,

[Seoul=Newsis] Reporter Kim Myung-nyeon = Jang Dong-hyuk, leader of the People’s Power, and Cho Kook, leader of the Cho Kook Innovation Party, are sitting together at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the morning of the 1st. 2025.12.01. [email protected] /Photo=Kim Myung-nyeon,
, ‘After listening to Cho’s comments, Jang said, “The roles of the Cho Kook Innovation Party and the People’s Power as opposition parties are not different,” noting, “While the Lee Jae-myung administration does not do everything wrong, it also doesn’t do everything right. As opposition parties, there are aspects where the Cho Kook Innovation Party and the People’s Power can cooperate and communicate regarding political reforms and various public welfare issues.” He further stated, “For our parliamentary democracy to function properly, we need to join forces in pointing out what the Lee Jae-myung government is doing wrong and where it is ignoring the people. I hope we can work together to ensure the separation of powers in Korea fulfills its role.”‘,
,
, ‘Cho then added, “While the Cho Kook Innovation Party is indeed an opposition party, as you mentioned, I believe there should be no compromise concerning relationships with rebellion and extreme-right forces. The Cho Kook Innovation Party will fulfill its role as an opposition party. Although our visions and policies differ from those of the People’s Power, I believe there is room for joint efforts in political and public welfare reforms.”‘,
,
, ‘Meanwhile, both leaders also agreed to quickly conclude discussions regarding the prosecution’s decision to drop the appeal in the corruption case involving the Daejang-dong development. Jang expressed, “There is significant public interest in the debate over the decision to drop the Daejang-dong appeal,” adding, “I hope we can present a true democratic discussion through a respectful debate.” Cho expressed gratitude by saying, “I appreciate your acceptance of my proposal for debate,” expressing hope for an honest and earnest discussion about the investigation, prosecution, and trial related to the Daejang-dong case, as well as issues related to prosecution and judicial reforms.’ ‘article_split’,
,