 |
| Gang Kyung-jun and Jang Shin-young in Jang Shin-young’s Instagram/Photo by Jang Shin-young |
 |
| Gang Kyung-jun and Jang Shin-young in Jang Shin-young’s Instagram/Photo by Jang Shin-young |
 |
| Gang Kyung-jun and Jang Shin-young in Jang Shin-young’s Instagram/Photo by Jang Shin-young |
 |
| Gang Kyung-jun and Jang Shin-young in Jang Shin-young’s Instagram/Photo by Jang Shin-young |
, “Actor Jang Shin-young continues to maintain her ‘love+Instagram’ (Love+Instagram) account while carrying on her marriage with husband Gang Kyung-jun, who was embroiled in cheating allegations.”, “As of the 25th, Jang Shin-young’s Instagram still features couple photos with Gang Kyung-jun.”, “Earlier, Gang Kyung-jun’s legal representative stated on Star News on the 24th that there are no ongoing divorce proceedings between Gang Kyung-jun and Jang Shin-young, and that they are maintaining their marital relationship. The representative also mentioned that they are not aware of the detailed circumstances of this case.”, “
Gang Kyung-jun and Jang Shin-young got married in 2018 and have two sons together. However, Gang Kyung-jun was sued for 50 million won in damages last December for being named as an adulterer. The plaintiff, referred to as ‘A,’ claimed that Gang Kyung-jun engaged in misconduct knowing that his wife ‘B’ was a married woman. At that time, Gang Kyung-jun’s side explained it as a case of mutual misunderstanding.”, “However, private conversations between Gang Kyung-jun and ‘A’ were later revealed, causing a stir. As a result, their agency stated that they had ended their exclusive contract with Gang Kyung-jun, citing it as relating to the actor’s personal life and therefore not subject to further response from the company.”, “Subsequently, on the 24th, the Seoul Family Court’s Family Division 5 (Judge Kim Mi-ho) held the initial trial for the alimony claim lawsuit filed against Gang Kyung-jun. During the trial, the court issued a decision regarding the demands made by the plaintiff. ‘Indorsement’ means that the defendant acknowledges the plaintiff’s claims and grants them the right to demand satisfaction.”, “After the trial, Gang Kyung-jun relayed through his legal representative that he decided to respond to the lawsuit by complying with the plaintiff’s demands rather than escalating the situation through clarifications or engaging in legal disputes over any factual discrepancies to prevent further distress to the parties involved and discomfort to those who supported him.”
Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today
