Written by 10:57 AM Politics

‘Head of the Military Manpower Administration’ Deputy Director’s Promotion.. “Will he be the new commissioner of the Military Manpower Administration?” Opposition in shock

, ‘\n’,
, “Criticism from the opposition party is emerging that appointing the vice head of the President’s security office as the new head of the Military Manpower Administration is a reward for ‘over-the-top’ security.”,
,
, ‘Yesterday, the President’s office appointed Kim Jong-chul as the new head of the Military Manpower Administration.’,
,
, ‘Kim, who graduated from the Army Academy and retired as a reserve Army major after serving in the military for over 30 years, has been in charge of the President’s security office since May 2022.’,
,
, ‘The President’s office stated, “As the head of the security office, Kim has re-established the security protocol following the relocation of the President’s office to Yongsan, and has handled cooperative tasks with related agencies such as the Ministry of National Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff in detail.”‘,
,
, “However, controversy has arisen as Kim Jong-chul, the new head of the Military Manpower Administration, was the person in charge of the security office that caused controversy as an ‘over-the-top’ security measure, drawing public criticism.”,
,
, ‘Kang Yu-jung, the spokesperson for the Democratic Party, criticized, stating, “The security office received public criticism for ‘over-the-top’ and excessive security measures, causing public condemnation,” and pointing out that “promoting a first-grade vice head to the level of a vice minister like the head of the Military Manpower Administration after being called for the dismissal of the responsible party and an apology is problematic.”‘,
,
, ‘Hong Sung-kyu, the spokesperson for the Progressive Party, expressed confusion, saying, “It is bewildering that the party involved was promoted without any statement or apology regarding the ‘over-the-top’ security, especially when the public demanded a shift in the government direction in the recent general election, but it seems that the President’s office has no intention of following through.”‘,
,
, “The Presidential Security Office has previously sparked controversy over ‘over-the-top’ security measures for Kang Sung-hee, a member of the Progressive Party, Shin Mingi, a graduate of KAIST, and Im Hyeontaek, the president of the Korean Society of Pediatricians, since January.”,
,
, ‘The President’s office has stated that these measures were taken in accordance with security principles and has not expressed regret regarding the issue.’,
,
,

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today
Close Search Window
Close