Noh So-young, partner of Choi Tae-won, claims 3 billion won in spousal support in a lawsuit, the verdict of which will be announced today in the first trial.

No Soyoung, Cho Tae-won’s cohabitant sued in 1st trial
The appellate court for divorce lawsuit ruled for property division of around 10 billion won
Cho Tae-won appealed the appellate court’s decision and brought it to the Supreme Court,

[Seoul=Newsis] Reporter Kim Geum-bo = No Soyoung (63), head of Art Center Nabi, filed a 3 billion won alimony claim lawsuit against Kim Hee-young, director of TNC Foundation known as the cohabitant of Cho Tae-won (64), SK Group chairman. Sharing the news on the result of the 1st trial on the 22nd. The photo shows Cho Tae-won (left) attending the 2nd appeal hearing of the Cho Tae-won-No Soyoung divorce lawsuit held at Seoul Central District Court in Seoul in April 2024, and No Soyoung, head of Art Center Nabi, leaving the court after the hearing. April 16, 2024. [email protected], ‘[Seoul=Newsis] Reporter Lee So-heon = No Soyoung (63), head of Art Center Nabi, filed a 3 billion won alimony claim lawsuit against Kim Hee-young, director of TNC Foundation known as the cohabitant of Cho Tae-won (64), SK Group chairman.’,
,
, ‘According to the legal circles, Seoul Family Court Division 4 (Chief Judge Lee Kwang-woo) is holding the judgment date for the damages compensation lawsuit brought by Ms. No against Ms. Kim.’,
,
, ‘Previously, Mr. Cho and Ms. No held a wedding in September 1988 at the Blue House, the first year of President Roh Tae-woo’s term, and raised three children together. However, in 2015, Mr. Cho revealed the existence of an extramarital affair, expressing his intention to divorce Ms. No.’,
,
, ‘In July 2017, Mr. Cho filed for divorce mediation against Ms. No. Ms. No, who had been staunchly refusing the divorce, changed her stance two years later. She filed a counter-lawsuit against Mr. Cho, demanding divorce, alimony, and property division.’,
,
, ‘In December 2022, the 1st trial deemed it difficult to acknowledge that Ms. No substantially contributed to the formation and maintenance of SK shares, their appreciation, etc., essentially favoring Mr. Cho. Consequently, the court ruled for Mr. Cho to pay Ms. No 66.5 billion won for property division and 100 million won for alimony.’,
,
, ‘Last March, while the appellate trial was ongoing, Ms. No filed a lawsuit against Ms. Kim for 3 billion won in alimony, stating that she had suffered severe mental anguish due to causing the breakdown of her marital life with Mr. Cho.’,
,
, ‘Meanwhile, the appellate court for the divorce lawsuit judged that Ms. No’s ‘political influence’ and ‘household and housekeeping labor’ contributed to SK’s business activities and formation and appreciation of SK shares.’,
,
, ‘Accordingly, the appellate court ordered Mr. Cho to pay Ms. No 138.08 billion won, corresponding to 65% of the property, and 200 million won for alimony. Mr. Cho’s side appealed the decision.’,
,
, ‘The Supreme Court assigned the appeal trial of the divorce lawsuit between Mr. Cho and Ms. No to 1st division. Judge Seo Kyung-hwan will preside over the case. The 1st division consists of Judge Seo and other judges including Roh Tae-ak, Shin Suk-hee, and No Kyung-pil.’,
,
,